2008 Indigenous Commercially aware Casino & Racino Playing games Cash flow Researching.

A Amount of Adjustment

Oops! That giant hissing sound could be the gaming balloon that were growing over time, slowly losing air. But, it has not been a tide that lowered all ships however, as some emerging and expanding gaming jurisdictions showed strong growth in 2008.

Overall, the commercial and racetrack casino sectors (excluding Indian gaming), experienced a 3.5 percent decline in gaming revenues for 2008, generating a total of $36.2 billion, down some $800 million from 2007. It had been the Racino sector that’s tempered this drop, because they showed a gain of almost $1 billion in 2008, thereby bringing the Commercial sector market decline to $1.8 billion, or 6.7 percent. Nevada was the biggest loser in 2008, dropping almost $1.3 billion, more than half of which stemmed from the Las Vegas Strip segment.

Hunkering Down

For the most part, casino operators were caught relatively flat-footed by the extent of the 2008 revenue downturn, because it was not before the third and fourth quarters when it certainly nosedived. Riding the crest of year over year market growth around the world and the availability of ample credit and equity funds, new construction and expansion proliferated in recent years. Today, up against the realities of declining, or at best stagnant demand, several projects are actually considered over-leveraged and/or over-sized. As a result many gaming companies are trying to renegotiate their debt – made more difficult by lower valuations – while also paring down operational costs. The latter has become a very problematic conundrum when coping with your competition, especially in those jurisdictions which can be now vying for market shares with new emerging casino projects in neighboring areas. A topic we discuss more fully in the State by State analysis section of this publication.

As a result of the conditions the gaming industry landscape has become strewn with impending fatalities. On the list of more notable troubled firms are Station Casinos, Empire Resorts, Harrah’s Entertainment, Greektown Holdings, Legends Gaming, Tropicana Entertainment, Herbst Gaming; and the list grows each week.

“The length of time will these economic conditions persist, and are we at the bottom yet?” are questions no-one appears to be answering yet. What is clear however is that many gaming jurisdictions must discover ways to deal with an inferior pie.

This analysis includes only gaming revenues of licensed casinos and pari-mutuel outlets offering casino games, and not Indian gaming operations, card rooms, or small non-casino type slot locations. The whole article, including revenue tables can be acquired on our web page.토토사이트

Input/Output Model

A vital aspect that seems to have arisen from the ashes of this current trend is that many casino projects were just too big to aid themselves. The input, in terms of investment dollars, was not proportional to the output, in terms of net profit after debt service, in comparison to previously achieved results. More and/or bigger is not at all times better. Seeing the rise in non-gaming revenue at the Las Vegas Strip resorts, gave impetus to the development of more comprehensive amenities in a number of other jurisdictions. The flaw in this strategy however is that the costs associated with widening market penetration and occasioned-use, are significantly more than those incurred to attract the beds base market.

As daytripper markets are more competitive, casino venues must rely more and more on their in-house hotel patrons, and size their properties (and expectations) accordingly. While Steve Wynn started a significant trend in creating up-market mega-destinations, there simply was not enough demand on the Strip to warrant the countless other similar projects that followed that directed at exactly the same niche.

The key would be to strike a happy medium in project configurations; which of course require less of a ‘seat-of-pants’ approach, and one that is more studied. A shameless plug for development consultants like ourselves.

Other Gaming Activities

Although you will find no published detailed data of American Indian gaming revenues, anecdotal evidence seems to suggest that this segment has been as hard hit because the Commercial sector. The 2 Connecticut Indian gaming installations report slot revenue of $1.6 billion in 2008, representing a fall of about 7 percent, or almost $114 million, a lot more than doubling the 3.5 percent drop from the entire year before. This market is apparently still reeling from the ripple-effect of a casino expansion in Rhode Island, and the opening of slot operations in New York and Pennsylvania.

The Arizona Department of Gaming reports that contributions based on a gambling revenue formula from the state’s 23 Indian gaming casinos, have been declining every quarter in 2008 set alongside the previous year; decreasing .8 percent in the first quarter, 7.5 percent in the 2nd quarter, 9.5 percent in the 3rd quarter, and 16.1 percent in the fourth quarter.

Some SEC reporting Indian gaming properties report similar decreases. Seneca Gaming, which operates three Class III casinos in upstate New York, reports that while calendar year 2008 showed a nearly 2 percent growth rate in gaming revenues, there is an 8.7 percent decline in the 3rd quarter and a nearly 10 percent decline in the fourth quarter of 2008, weighed against 2007. Gaming revenue trends at nearby Niagara Falls, Ontario were down 1.5% in 2008 weighed against 2007.

It’s been a mixed-bag for state lotteries across the country. The North American Association of State & Provincial Lotteries reports that U.S. lotteries generated a total of $60.6 billion in sales in fiscal 2008, up about 3 percent from the last year; yet some jurisdictions reported decreases, such as California, which showed an 8 percent drop. Inasmuch as many of these states are on various fiscal year ends, it would seem that the data does not reflect the impact of third and/or fourth quarter results.

Based on data supplied by Equibase, horse racing pari-mutuel revenues continue their downward spiral, falling 7 percent to $13.7 billion in 2008, versus $14.7 billion in 2007.

Planned & Proposed New Expansions

As previously noted, it has been new gaming jurisdictions that have spawned a lot of the growth in annual casino/racino revenues over time, and their impact is apt to keep to the near future.

Miami Dade voters approved a ballot issue that allows every one of three pari-mutuels to have a casino facility all the way to 2,000 slot machines. The Flagler Dog Track and Miami Jai-Alai are reportedly planning opening in late 2009 or early 2010, while the Calder installation in Miami Gardens has yet to announced its plans. You’ll find so many other proposals being considered that would further expand casino development through the state.

Their state finally got around to reissuing its tenth license, late in December, 2008; awarding it to Midwest Gaming & Entertainment, LLC for a 1,200+ game casino positioned in Des Plaines just east of O’Hare. The new facility is not likely to open until 2010. There’s also been some discussion about allowing a growth in per location gaming positions and slots at racetracks, although neither initiative seems to have any traction at this time.

The state’s expanded lottery program that allows for the development of four casino gaming zones and slots at existing horse and dog tracks appears mired, as just one facility is presently under construction, while three other proposals were rescinded. The only real bidder on the Cherokee County contract, claimed it may not compete with the new Quapaw tribal casino in Oklahoma, which is located so near to the state line that its parking lot is in Kansas. The Boot Hill Casino Resort in Dodge City is planing a December 2009 opening with 575 slots and 10 table games, and also a second phase because of open in 2011 with 875 slots and 20 table games. Their state has extended the application form process for the other three zones until April, 2009.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *